Volume 2 Issue 1
January 2000
The
subject: The New Humanity
Thanks to all the writers who have offered
their wisdom, opinions and care to stimulate our discussion this quarter.
As you read these thoughts, we hope you’ll let God broaden your horizon
to see all the people he loves and see all the ways you could love
them. We are convinced that God’s heart is open to everyone and the
way to eternity is free. But how to make that all important connection
— that’s the question.
Can
the Rich and the Poor Co-exist in the Kingdom of God?
The
answer to the question above seems simple, right? But upon deeper
consideration it only begs further questions and demands clarification.
Here are a few questions
that arise: What IS the distinction between rich and poor? Is it
as simple as economic difference? Can we divorce issues of gender
and race from class? How would Jesus reflect on the fact that the
richest one percent of the American population owns 40 percent of
our nation’s wealth? And most importantly, why didn’t your fourth
grade Sunday school teacher avail to you the theories of Karl Marx?
Marx advocated a "rising
up of the people" in an era when there was a clear division
between those who had and those who had not. It is unlikely that
Marx ever envisioned the "people" consisting of a brotherhood
of wide-eyed college students and broad shouldered unionists gathering
together to protest in the face of the World Trade Organization,
kicking in windows of the local Banana Republic store in Seattle.
Today the wall that divides the rich and the poor is less clear,
and becoming even more blurred with the advent of a technologically
driven society.
The "Digital Divide"
has been hailed by some as the new defining barrier between rich
and poor in a country that anxiously awaits the next technological
advancement, be it a new operating system from Windows or a really
cool version of Doom. The disparity between those who have access
to the information highway and those who don’t is increasing as
quickly as Bill Gates’ net worth. The poor and the working class,
who can’t afford personal computers, find themselves on the outside
looking in at an economy that is flourishing via technology. However,
it is oversimplified to believe that future class wars will be fought
only on the battlefields of computer literacy. The distinction between
the classes encompasses issues of economics intertwined with a multitude
of social issues, including gender and race.
It is impossible to enter
into a debate about classism without defining just exactly who is
rich and who is poor. Is it the single mother of two, flipping burgers
at McDonalds who is poor? In a developing country someone making
$16,000 a year is practically aristocracy. According to Marxist
theory it seems that a middle manager at Microsoft making $100,000
a year is just as ‘poor’ because s/he is dispensable, in that s/he
does not own the means of production. However, in a class war would
this middle manager and McDonalds mother join as equals in the oppressed
proletariat to fight against the capitalist powers that become increasingly
rich through their labors? It is astounding that in the United States
500 individuals, most likely all white males, control two thousand
billion dollars in business assets. In reality, most people believe
that they have a clear definition of who the ‘poor’ are, drawn from
a vague interpretation of an apparent ‘culture of poverty.’ However,
defining this culture is seemingly implausible, as one attempts
to sort through the myriad of gender, race and other socioeconomic
issues.
In Jesus Christ our exhaustive
intellectual efforts to make sense of classism are subverted, "There
is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you
are all one in Christ Jesus" Galatians
3:28, NIV. When the Kingdom of
God is realized in its fullness will there be distinctions between
the rich and the poor? Justice demands that there will be no poor
in Heaven; therefore, our call as the Church in the Kingdom as it
is now is to be working toward eradicating these distinctions.
Settling for reconciliation
between the classes maintains the social order that now exists between
rich and poor. It is not enough just for everyone to get along –
we must cry out for justice. The Biblical model for the body of
Christ is to ensure that everyone is sustained equally, "All
the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling
their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as they had need"
Acts 2:44-45, NIV.
Back to the initial
question, can the rich and the poor co-exist in the Kingdom of God?
The answer is an unequivocal "No!" We as a Church must
labor so that "justice rolls on like a river, righteousness
like a never-failing stream!" Amos
5:24, NIV.
Pam Rowen and Bob Herzog
Interview:
A Transcultural Christian
A part of Circle of
Hope, now, Jen Thuma grew up in Zambia, southern Africa. She lived
there from age 1 to 3 and then
again from age 8 to 15. Her father
was a doctor with the Brethren in Christ world missions and grew
up in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Her grandmother was a missionary kid
from India. Transcultural Christianity has been the norm for the
Thuma family. The following interview investigates her experiences
as such a person.
How is it different
being a Christian in Zambia as compared to being a Christian in
the US.?
I don’t think it’s different
being a Christian in Zambia; I think the Bible’s pretty clear about
what our roles are. We’re supposed to love each other, love our
enemies, and let the Spirit guide us. The difference is in how it’s
played out. In different cultures Christianity gets expressed in
different ways. For example, when the early BIC missionaries came
to Africa one of the first things they tried to do was dress the
native villagers like the missionaries themselves were dressed because
it was "modest." The villagers, in their [the missionaries]
minds, were indecently dressed. In reality the people of Africa
were dressed appropriately for their climate and life. The women
didn’t need long skirts to get caught in the fire! The missionaries
could only see it through the eyes of their own culture.
Here’s another example
of a difference that’s even more relevant to today that I remember
from being there. Polygamy is very, very common in Zambia. One of
the deacons had two wives and this became an issue. And what do
you do as a Christian after you have 5 wives? Do you divorce 4 of
them ? But does having more than one wife make them any less a Christian?
Do you think it's
even relevant to discuss these similarities and differences or do
you think it's more productive to discuss that we're all under one
Authority and one Kingdom of God?
I don’t think the answer
is that simple. It’s not a matter of similarities and differences
because focusing on that puts huge walls up between people. But
it is important to be aware of the differences in cultures. In our
American culture we expect people to be aware of our culture and
we’re offended if they’re not observant of it. I think we need to
be sensitive to those in other countries to the best of our abilities
as well.
When we say we’re under
one Authority and Kingdom of God, that’s all very true, but we need
to make sure that we’re saying the same thing. Making sure what
you’re meaning is getting across as well as just what you’re saying.
I see that there is a problem with cultural views getting in the
way of communication- not just country to country but also person
to person. Even people who haven’t been out of the state are in
mini cultures of their own. I think that it’s important for us to
somehow either by education or sheer willingness to be able to see
out of our own culture…either in America or just in our own family.
In Zambia there wasn’t
segregation or apartheid but it was unique to see others integrating
into the life and culture of the local people. The Brethren in Christ
church was intentionally good at that. When leaders and members
of our church would get together it was a very mixed group. There
were people from Zimbabwe, Zambia, Europeans, Americans. We were
all Christians and spent time together and shared and there was
really no distinction made.
How has the life of
Jesus impacted your love for other nations of the world? In what
ways?
As a whole I can say
that life with Jesus as shown in the Bible and the life of my family
has impacted my love for other nations. Observation about how Jesus
crossed boundaries stands out to me. I’m thinking about when he
spoke to women, when he talked to Samaritans and interacted with
people across the Sea of Galilee. All three of those were not acceptable
to interact with according to his culture and he stepped over the
boundaries, showing what was right.
Anna James
A
Road to Understanding
For
over a year now I have been talking to one of our pastors, Rod White,
about the possibility of participating in the Damascus Road process.
The Damascus Road is a training process designed to help organizations
develop the biblical background and analytical skills necessary
to detect and fight institutional racism. Rod became a team member
about a year ago as a member of the MCC East Coast Board. At that
time our cell was trying to focus on the issue of racism and it
seemed like the training might fit.
Now the time has come
to form a team that will go through two intense training times over
the next six months. While I'm sure there will be a tremendous amount
of personal growth, the desire is that the team gain skills to become
a resource, enabling Circle of Hope to continue its efforts in being
an anti-racist environment.
I entered this process
still coming to grips with my own understanding of race. As a black
American who grew up with many upper middle class advantages I have
found it, at times, very difficult to get in touch with the pain
associated with the effects of institutional racism. But as my understanding
grows I find it easier to identify with the pain and to see how
easy it is to just buy into the system as it stands. It has also
become clear how hard it is to separate the issues of race from
class. I look forward to learning more about these issues and how
I can play a role in what Jesus is doing to tear down that stronghold.
The team format is particularly exciting to me in that you will
have a group of brothers and sisters you are committed to, to work
on these issues.
As we return from the
times of training I am curious how we will be received. Will we
be used as a resource? Will we just be another group clamoring for
limited attention spans? Will people still not even understand that
the issue of racism is one that not only Circle of Hope wants
to take seriously, but that the Body of Christ needs to take
seriously and therefore just blow us off?
I think there are yet
many unanswered questions, but there is hope inherent in being part
of something bigger than yourself that you know Jesus is excited
about. I look for healing, reconciliation, increased knowledge,
and righteous anger to spring from this and inform and impact how
we go about being a Circle of Hope for ALL people.
Dave Valentine
Where Are the Angry
White Christians?
Conrad
Moore spoke vulnerably and forcefully at worship on January 16.
His story of his life as a black man in Philadelphia was heartbreaking.
It was probably shocking to some people who are generally blinded
to the reality that so many people experience in the U.S. I was
glad an "angry black male" (as he called himself) was
willing to speak to us.
But one of my African
American friends wrote me an e-mail that made me wonder whether
it was such a great event after all. My friend reminded me again
about how tiresome it is for black people to not only bear the burden
of racism, but to bear the burden of undoing it. The sin of racism,
is not a black problem, it is a white problem.
Say all you want about
how everyone is prejudiced and how the problem is a human
problem. But the fact is, white people invented and preserved the
American brand of racism that infects every thing we are and do
in this country. Whites have the privileges racism created and whites
have the power to keep their privileges or "share" them.
They still run all the institutions and still blindly think everything
is mostly fine — because it is mostly fine for them. Especially
in the church, where we glowingly talk of love and justice, racism
is a so-called white person’s problem.
We hear a lot about angry
white males these days, who are feeling the threat of their privilege
eroding as people of color take advantages of legal changes that
have been made in the last 30 years. But we don‘t hear about angry
white Christians furious that people of color, especially the ancestors
of slaves, do not receive justice. Like Conrad Moore implied in
his speech to us, people of color are more likely to hear frustration
that the "problem" is still coming up — "Why don’t
you just get over it!"
Where are the angry white
Christians?
Well, I am one. I don‘t
know if I am as angry as my e-mailing friend would like, or if I
am willing to start talking about how angry is angry enough. But
I am angry about racism. I have dedicated three years of training
through the Plowshares Institute and Damascus Road to try and figure
out how to do proactive things that can undo racism. But I am still
angry. I thought I’d take the bait of my friend and come out about
it.
The Bible says, "Be
angry but do not sin." I’m working on that. If I’m sinning,
here, you let me know. But here are a few of the reasons I am angry
about racism.
1) I am tired of being
called white. I am a healthy dose of native American, for one thing.
But I don‘t much like that some people invented a racial distinction
called "white" to use as a social tool and then fit me
into it. I don‘t liked being lumped together like that. I am a Christian,
not white. So stop calling me that. You can dump black and yellow
and brown, while you are at it, as far as I‘m concerned.
2) I am mad and embarrassed
that the church is still so segregated. People tell me that it is
a matter of culture and taste, but I still think it is sin. I think
Circle of Hope is mostly white because the so-called white people
in it can’t bother themselves to make relationships across lines
that aren’t "comfortable" for them and the black people
in town feel like they’ll lose their soul if they connect with "whites."
Both sides are substantially conformed to the racist, sinful construct
that was imposed on us all by people who did not care about Jesus.
3) I am angry that I
live in a city and area that still reacts to race first. I know
from my own experience that, on the street, being white is an advantage.
My son and I have both been stopped by the police for driving around
in black areas of the city, and I hardly know any black male who
has not been stopped for being black. We all profile. The main threat
one of my friends says, is not being pulled over for a DUI it is
being pulled over for a DWB — driving while black.
4) I’m angry that I have
so many friends that roll their eyes when I start getting mad about
racism. They are tired of people being "politically correct."
I’m angry that mere political correctness has stolen the fire of
righteousness when it comes to racism. I couldn’t care less about
politics — that’s just a tool to use to foment justice. I care about
righteousness flowing like a river through my church and city. Please
don‘t dismiss me like I’m a Democrat, or something. God needs a
lot more than a Democrat!
5) There were some die-hard
abolitionists in the UK and the USA in the first half of the 1800’s
who hounded their governments until they abolished slavery. Most
of them were Christians. Martin Luther King and others in the Civil
Rights Movement were mainly motivated by Jesus, too. So what is
up with the Christians of today? Are we under the illusion that
everything is fine — no matter the facts? Or are we under the bondage
of the domination system so completely that we can’t even see what
is happening? Surely we can’t just be so unspiritual that all we
care about is whether our personal economics are doing OK! I’m a
lonely, anachronistic, angry abolitionist.
Where are the angry,
so-called white, called-by-God-to-love-and-truth Christians?
Rod White
|