|
Dialogue
Volume 3 Issue 3
July 2001
The subject: Money
People who want
to get rich fall into temptation and a trap and into many foolish
and harmful desires that plunge [people] into ruin and destruction.
For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people,
eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves
with many griefs. But you, [follower] of God, flee from all this,
and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, endurance and
gentleness. 1 Timothy 6:9-11.
The verses above are
full of radical stuff when they are read in the good old U.S. of
A. Christians argue themselves out of taking them seriously all
the time. Youd think wed all had a class on "How
to Be American and Still Convince Yourself You Listen to the Bible
on the Subject of Money, Ever."
This issue of the Dialogue
tries to help us listen, if we dare.
As we listen, some
of us will be learning the spiritual disciplines of money. They
arent all about doing without, living in community, or creatively
sharing with the poor and developing opportunity with them. They
are also about balancing a checkbook and being conscious of how
we spend. They are also about seeing ourselves as trustees for resources
God has given us and learning an investmentin-the-kingdom-of-God
strategy. They are also about having a job that considers someone
elses needs as well as our own and making purchases and contracts
that dont use every scrap of what weve got on what we,
alone, want.
As we listen, some
of us will be learning the math of funding our churchs mission.
For instance, here is a word problem for you. If 170 Circle of Hopers
all gave a tithe (10%) of their income to the Common Fund they use
to fuel their ministry, take care of the needy among them and generate
compassion and truth-telling all over the world, how much would
that fund receive in a year? Say each person makes only $20,000
a year. Say a good third of them are unable to give anything at
all. What would be our income? 114 X 2000 = $228,000. Thats
way over double what we expect to receive this year. It is amazing
how much opportunity we would have if we got together and shared
a portion of our money, isnt it?
If there is any one
thing that an American Christian (one of the richest people the
world has ever known) should know about, it is money. If we can
learn the disciplines, do the math, and SHARE, just imagine what
will become of us!
Ed. Rod
White
SimplicityTo
Will One Thing
Kierkegaard wrote the following parable:
When the prosperous
man on a dark but star-lit night drives comfortably in his carriage
and has the lanterns lighted, aye, then he is safe, he fears no
difficulty, he carries his light with him, and it is not dark close
around him; but precisely because he has the lanterns lighted, and
has a strong light close to him, precisely for this reason he cannot
see the stars, for his lights obscure the stars, which the poor
peasant driving without lights can see gloriously in the dark but
starry night. So those deceived ones live in temporal existence:
either, occupied with the necessities of life, they are too busy
to avail themselves of the view, or in their prosperity and good
days they have, as it were, lanterns lighted, and close about them
everything is so satisfactory, so pleasant, so comfortable - but
the view is lacking, the prospect, the view of the stars.
One of the dangers
in considering the topic of simplicity is that we can err is two
directions. We can romanticize poverty and assume that if we had
little we would have a simple life. As the parable points out, we
humans find much to distract us from a view of life that is full
and rich and being occupied with getting what we need as poverty
often demands is not the guarantee of simple, contented living.
But for many of us who read the Dialogue, the greater threat is
from having more not less. We have lanterns to light and much more.
In fact we have so much more that we do not even know that what
might heal us is a simple view of the stars.
As we discussed this the other night
at one of the Circle classes on our assets, the group was quick
to point out that we tend to fill our lives up with things and people
in the hope that it will feel full. It often leaves us feeling empty
instead. It's not that we don't know how to be entertained. There's
media everywhere that promises to occupy us, but there's a component
of purpose and pleasure that remains illusive for too many of us.
My take on this is that we suffer from feeling out of touch in some
authentic way with ourselves. We settle for being busy or entertained
and respond to the flood of promises that we will be fulfilled if
only we have or do this or that. In essence we shift the focus
of our searching away from meaning and turn it to something more
tangible. In the frenzy of our search, we are distanced from our
true selves and we lack the kinds of experiences that open us up
to seeing beyond the little ring of light we can keep lit around
us.
So how might we reconnect
with ourselves? Each individual has her own unique story that explains
how she has disconnected, but it seemed helpful the other night
in our discussion to consider a few general points for the sake
of discussion. When each of us was born, we were completely dependent
creatures. The human infant remains dependent on his caregivers
longer than any other species on the planet. As we matured through
the care of those around us, we became more able to supply various
things for ourselves. Forgive me for pointing out the negative here,
but human beings seem to focus on negative aspects of their experience.
People generally report that they remember criticism far more easily
than praise. Couples therapy researchers tell us that negative comments
that couples make to each other carry far more weight in terms of
the relational dynamics than do positive comments. We take in the
negative. I suggest to you, that because of this, we have taken
in the negative about our earliest care, as well, and we have formed
ourselves around a desperate search to fill up what we experienced
as missing. We have deeply rooted images of ourselves and others
that are so difficult to bear that we store them away outside of
our conscious awareness. We represent ourselves, even to ourselves,
as something other than what we actually believe we are. Psychologically
we can't bear the pain of the deeper reality so we create new images
of ourselves that continue the desperate search to fill in what
is missing. But this search seems to our quick (sometimes shallow)
thinking to be nothing desperate at all. So we are set up for all
the advertisers who aim their ads at creating desire and need in
us and get us thinking and feeling and (they hope) behaving in line
with what they tell us we must have or do. We crowd our lives
with this sort of seeking to have and do and we lose sight of the
stars.
Jesus understood this
problem and process. He communicated the heart of this to Martha
one day when she was frantic in her attempts to produce a suitable
meal for Him and His friends. Martha's sister Mary was sitting listening
to Jesus talk about life. Mary was neglecting her "duty" to produce
a meal and instead obeying a higher duty to take in the meaning
of life when the opportunity presented itself to her in the Person
of Jesus. Martha sticks to her plan and her custom of preparing
the food. With each task she feels more overwhelmed and more disconnected
from what she wants to have happen in her life. She finally says
something to Jesus and to Mary. She gets mad and blows up because
her plan wasn't working. Jesus speaks directly to the sort of living
we all do when He spoke to Martha even though our pursuits may not
look exactly like Martha doing her "duty." We have other strategies
to get what we think we must have but we feel a similar desperation.
Jesus says to Martha, "only one thing is needed. Mary has chosen
what is better." (Luke 10). In some older translations of the Bible
He says Mary "wills one thing" and Jesus affirms that. Mary pays
attention not to the media of her time telling her what experiences
she must have (being praised by men for cooking well or being
hard-working, etc.), but to the opportunity to connect with the
One who is Life-giving. Mary resists the pressure to buoy up her
self-esteem by winning approval from others around her by showing
off all the great stuff she has in her house or by demonstrating
her skill as cook, housecleaner, etc. Instead she focuses on one
thing: she simply listens to the source of her life. Will she ever
work again? We know she does. Will she lose track of this simplicity
of willing one thing and be distracted and take up the frantic search
to fill herself? We know she does that, too. But here is this glorious
moment when she gets it. She sees the stars. Jesus is beckoning
Martha to join Mary outside the circle of her own attempts at making
life happen. It's a rather abrupt message. Stop it, Martha! You
are doing things, thinking things and feeling things that are not
necessary. Simplicity has something to do with understanding our
confusion about who we are and what we can do. It is giving up the
exhausting pursuit to get more in the subtle ways we have arranged
for that. It is waiting instead of getting. It is doing without
some of what our plan says we must get in order to hear from within
about what is truly valuable, helpful, holy. It is not deprivation,
but development. It is cleaning house in order to live in a beautiful
space rather than staying cramped in a congested room.
Gwen White
Lets
Be More Like Barnabas
We
are a body that is defined by community. We worship in community
on Sunday evenings. We gather in community in our cell groups. Many
of us live in community. Notice all of the verbs: worship, gather,
live. These are all active verbs. Community cannot exist without
action. Action, however is not just physical, rather it is spiritual,
emotional, and also financial. It is the action of opening ourselves
up so that the line between our individuality blurs with the collective
conscience that is created by our community. We have done a good
job in sharing our physical, spiritual and emotional lives with
each other. Cell groups, friendships, living arrangements, and the
public meeting facilitate this sharing. However, too often the community
that we have created in these areas does not extend to our wallets
or our checkbooks. Too many of us view this aspect of our lives
as personal and private, rather than corporate. We tend to shudder
at the question, "So how much do you earn?" There is no
doubt that much of this privacy stems from the culture of individualism
that is so pervasive in our culture. Much of it comes from the models
that were provided to us by our parents. However, whatever its origin,
a view that "my money is my money" is destructive to the
very community that many of us hold dear.
As Christians we are
called to share our lives together, all of our lives. We are called
to pool our resources for the good and the benefit of the community.
We do it, not because we feel like we have to, but rather because
as a part of the community of Circle of Hope we are committed to
a vision that is larger than ourselves. We are committed to being
a new creation in Jesus Christ that is not bound by the traditions
of this world. Too many of us have been shackled by the values of
capitalism that tell us to accumulate and consume. Culture tells
us that we are valuable if we earn a lot of money, drive SUVs, live
in large houses in the suburbs, and rack up high credit card debt.
Many of my law school colleagues will be earning over $100,000 next
year. This is common knowledge throughout much of the law school,
however the topic of salaries and perks is not discussed. I am frequently
chastised by my colleagues for pointing out the obscenity of these
salaries. I am chastised, in part because they know I am right,
but also because there is myth that this information should remain
private. We are addicted to privacy.
However, as a church
we cannot be addicted to notions of privacy. We cannot continue
to believe in the myth that "the way I spend my money is personal,
it is private." To do so gives the impression that it only
affects you as an individual. However, as many of us saw just a
few months ago, the way that we spend our money affects us all;
it affects our community. Many of you know about the financial problems
that Circle was having at the beginning of this year. For the time
being we have averted the crisis, however, we will be back there
shortly if we corporately dont change our giving habits. I
know that money is powerful. For many of us it evokes images of
guilt, shame, pride, or a whole host of other destructive behaviors.
However, merely because it can be powerful, does not mean that we
should not deal with it.
You may be asking where is he going
with this? Quite frankly, I am not sure, but I think that that the
Bible has some good lessons about wealth. The Book of Acts talks
openly about the believers "having everything in common,"
and "distributing to each as anyone had need." (See, Acts
4:32, 35). Was this communism? I doubt very much that the early
church was setting up an economic system. However, they surely were
responding to the needs of their community. They were responding
to each other in Christlike compassion. Acts 4:37-5:11, also teaches
us about Barnabas, Ananias and Sapphira. The core lesson (at least
in my opinion) to be learned from these stories is that how we hold
assets, be it houses, money, prestige, speaks volumes about our
values. Barnabas converted his land that he owned into a cash gift
for the needy believers (4:36-37). He let go of his money, laying
it at the apostles feet to be administered by them. By contrast,
Ananias and Sapphira practiced a similar transaction for the same
need, but lied about it (5:1-2). Apparently they wanted to look
good among the believers but also wanted to personally hold onto
some of their possessions. What can we learn from this? I think
that God calls us as believers to hold our resources lightly. After
all everything that we have comes from Him. He gives it to us as
a trust to be managed for His benefit, not as a treasure to be hoarded
for ours.
So what am I saying?
I am saying that as a community we need to be more like Barnabas.
We need to let go of the notion that the way we manage our money
is a private affair. We are a community. As a community we have
been entrusted with a large number of resources. These resources
are not ours as individuals, in fact they are not even ours as a
community. Rather, they are Gods resources that He has entrusted
to us to manage and to share. I could go on for pages and pages
about this topic. It is something that I am passionate about, but
quite frankly I am also frightened about. However, the bottom line
is that I trust God, and I trust this community. Acts 4:32-33 says,
"Now the multitude of those who believed were of one heart
and one soul, neither did anyone say that any of the things that
he possessed was his own, but they had all things in common. And
with great power the apostles gave witness to the resurrection of
the Lord Jesus." In a world that values possession of wealth
as the supreme goal, we as a Body should constantly be striving
to be more like Baranabas, and in so doing we will continue to be
a great witness to the resurrection of Jesus Christ.
Patrick Cicero
Starving
Mammon
Reflections
from Our Study of Money and Community
I dont like jumping
into debates about political ideology. They polarize us. They keep
us in the world of concepts. So rather than giving a case against
capitalism (there are plenty of good ones out there already), I
want us to be drawn more deeply into the magnetic and dangerous
love of the Gospels.
As we read those narratives,
it is important to note that Jesus gives money a name: MAMMON. Money
is not simply bartering currency. Money is a personified power,
a very alive and seductive "being" that absorbs and enslaves
the Children of God.
Because of the dangers
of that bondage, I want us to try to figure out what it means to
be reborn into a new Family. It is a citywide and worldwide family
in which some of our sisters and brothers are literally starving
while others of us have money in a bank. That fact demands a response.
But as we talk about what our response should be, it is also my
desire to allow for "multidimensional discipleship." I
want us to recognize that we do not all respond to the call of Jesus
in the same way (but we must respond). Rich Mullins said it like
this,
A lot of people are
all into this born again thing and say that to inherit
eternal life you have to be born again. Yes, Jesus says that to
one guy, Nicodemus. But if you tell me I have to be born again,
I can tell you that you have to sell all you have and give it to
the poor. Jesus says that to one guy too.
So each of us must
discern the nudging of the Spirit in our midst, personally, perhaps
as a biological family, and of course as the Family of God.
The idea of family
is central to a biblical understanding of money. That is especially
clear when we look at the first Christians. In the early Church,
for one person to have more than they needed while someone else
was without was THEFT. For one person to have the capacity to feed
the starving and not do so was MURDER. Imagine in our own biological
families -- if one family member, say the father, was grubbing it
up and had food in his pantry, and yet his daughter was starving...
is this not murder? How much more should this be true in the Family
of the Reborn? When we Christians care for each other, we are caring
for our own flesh and blood, our own Body, the Body of Christ. When
we starve one another (intentionally or unintentionally "when
did we see you...?" Mt. 25), we starve our own family, and
the Body of Jesus, and so our sisters and brothers groan. In fact,
it is recorded about the early Church, that if someone came to a
household in need of food and they did not have enough (which was
often the case), then the entire community would fast until there
was enough for everyone to eat. What a testimony to the contemporary
Church family!
While the Gospel call
is obviously an daunting call to suffer with others, it is also
a vision of hope for a new way of life. This hope is not simply
a hope of some future Kingdom when we die. I am convinced that Jesus
came not so much to prepare us to die, but to teach us to live,
to truly live the Kingdom of God into reality on earth as it is
in heaven. In that light, verses like this one from Mark take new
meaning:
ÿNo
one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father
or children or fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive
a hundred times as much IN THIS PRESENT AGE (homes, brothers...
fields and with them persecutions) and in the age to come eternal
life" (Mark 10:29-30).
I believe this is very
literal. As we discover this new way of life and discover how to
share all things in common, a wild multiplication of resources ensues.
When I, along with ten others, give up "my" house, I suddenly
have nine new homes. Now ten people have ten houses. It is an exponential
multiplication. As I leave my biological family, I now have hundreds
of mothers and brothers. It is a new way that stands in offensive
opposition to everything that is temporal and of this world.
This multiplication
also happens in regards to time. For instance, when our household
(we call it "the simple way") gets a vanful of donations,
we can unload it ten times faster as a community than I could alone.
And the only way that we could, practically and spiritually, do
all the things we do (feeding people, spending time with kids, rehabbing
houses, gardening...) is by having a community of folks surrounding
a common vision and way of life (more than just a sum of our parts).
I am not trying to
idealize the way we live in community. It is hard and painful. There
are times when it seems like it would be easier to do life alone
(I like the old quote: "I know you are strong enough to do
it alone, but are you strong enough to do it together?"). But
community is what we have been created for. The Bible is a story
of community -- from when it is not good for the first human to
be alone (needed a helper), to the new community created amongst
the refugees and slaves in Israel, to the apostles (never sent out
alone), and, of course, clear up to the early Church in Acts. We
are created in the image of God, a Trinity, a plurality of oneness.
Here at Circle, this
crazy journey into community continues to express itself in a wild
continuum of ways, from the deep to the mundane: cells, intentional
communities, joint childcare, shared rents, life partnerships, community
gardens, carpools. And yet there is so much more out there for us.
Sometimes what we are doing seems wild and extraordinary -- but
this is more revealing of the ubiquitous apathy of western Christianity
than it is of the true radical nature of our discipleship. We have
so much to learn from other communities such as the base communities
in Latin America, the Catholic workers, and particularly from the
Poor among us -- since poverty demands community to survive. Poor
people do not have to "intentionally" choose community;
their survival demands interdependence, creative resistance, and
alternative structures (this is why they are blessed "for theirs
is the Kingdom of God").
It is past time for
us to think of deeper ways of experiencing community, of bartering
and trading skills and creations, of making our own products and
food, of using the trash and wreckage of the consumptive world to
create things that bring life and beauty. We must keep dreaming
of alternative structures, such as new ways of sharing medical expenses
and accident costs so that those things which are at least inconsistent
and at most heretical to the Gospel (such as insurance and savings
accounts) become superfluous and fade into nonexistence as we usher
in the reign of God.
Shane Claiborne
Some
of our "proverbs" that relate to our money
We are always involved
in a dialogue as we build a system of trusting relationships in
which we can live a life of safety and daring. What follows are
a few of the proverbs we have decided to collect over the years
that say something about how we handle our money. Do you still think
that are worth keeping as statements to guide our common life? If
not, lets delete them, or tell the truth better as we reposition
ourselves this fall and draw a new map to where God is leading.
- We share our resources of time,
money and love person to person, with the leaders, between congregations.
- All our money belongs to God;
the percentage we share in our Common Fund reflects our mutual
commitment to be an authentic church.
- As part
of our obligation to mutually share resources with the poor and
lost, we invest at least 20% of our Common Fund income in causes
beyond the basic operation of our church.
- In an individualistic
age, being the church is a counter-cultural statement.
- We express justice by sharing
what God has given us with the poor and oppressed.
- We are obliged to speak
out against unjust laws and practices that oppress people and
ruin creation.
- We do not generally hand
out resources; we extend a resourceful hand.
|